
By Patroclos
PRESIDENT of European Commission Jean Claude Juncker may have thought he had brokered a halloumi deal between the two sides, after 24 hours of soul-destroying negotiations during his July visit.
An agreement was announced at the time, regarding the application for a Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) for halloumi/hellim, prez Nik eventually ignoring the objections of the foreign ministry’s hard-liners who felt the sovereignty of the Republic would be undermined.
It seems the patriotic nagging by the guardians of our state sovereignty at the foreign ministry eventually paid off, and according to a report from Brussels in last Sunday’s Phil, Nik has asked for four changes to the agreement. The office of the permanent representation in Brussels submitted a request for “substantial amendments” to the agreement, after receiving instructions from Nik, Phil reported.
You have to wonder whose advice Nik follows before making these decision. What credibility would he have when he is seeking changes to an agreement he reached two months ago in the presence of the EU chief? Will he do the same when he signs, God forbid, a settlement?
Was it his government spokesman Mr Nice Guy Christodoulides, who maintains the indestructible foreign ministry mindset that luxuriates in trivial triumphs? After all, it is Mrs spokesman who is handling the hellim issue at the foreign ministry and when the July agreement, that Nik has gone back on now, was reached she did not hide her dejection.
At the time, she reprimanded the agriculture minister Nicos Kouyialis who was involved in the agreement, telling him ‘the trouble with you politicians is that you say ‘yes’ to whatever they ask of you.’
I HAVE NO intention of boring readers with the four changes being sought by Nik, but will just mention some of the issues at stake as reported by Phil’s correspondent Pavlos Xanthoulis, who thinks just like the foreign ministry officials he gets his information from.
The Commission, he wrote, wanted to commit Nicosia to a “bi-communal motif” for all other applications for PDOs, “thus politicising a strictly technical matter and circumventing the obvious sovereign rights of a member-state.”
A worried Xanthoulis then posed the broader issue: “Reasonably, someone could ask what role the Commission would play in the Cyprus problem, if for halloumi, it is ready to sideline the legal State of the Cyprus Republic?” Someone else could ask, reasonably, is not linking halloumi to state sovereignty a case of politicising not just a technical matter, but also a dairy product?
Our foreign ministry’s other concern, reported by Xanthoulis, is that, as the certification of hellim would be done by a foreign company, the Turkish Cypriots might be able to export it from their illegal ports, which would put into practice ‘direct trade’ and thus upgrade the pseudo-state. We want hellim to be brought south and exported from legal ports.
The answer would be a PDO application for pseudo-hellim that is only produced in the pseudo-state by pseudo-sheep and goats and is exported from pseudo-ports. This would prevent the politicising of a technical matter.
THE CAMPAIGN to persuade us all that Mustafa Akinci is a grey wolf in sheep’s clothing was stepped up after his remark about the hydrocarbons, which was interpreted as threat of war by our bash patriotic warriors.
Ethnarch Junior, who noted “Mr Akinci is threatening us with war over natural gas and still President Anastasiades, DISY and AKEL continue to advertise the ‘good climate’ in the peace talks,” was the only party leader who arrived at this conclusion. Not even Lillikas, who has advocated the “deconstruction of Akinci’s picture of saintliness,” jumped to this conclusion.
This was Phil’s line in its Wednesday edition when it had a story headlined, “Akinci: natural gas cause of war.” In its leader the following day the paper advertised its post-modernist worldview. “We do not believe there are many readings, interpretations to the things Mr Mustafa Akinci said, briefing the ‘society of citizens’ about the Cyprus problem.”
Simerini’s Lazarus Mavros agreed: “Mr Akinci spelled out the Turkish war threat over the EEZ and natural gas, succinctly and very clearly.” The paper’s leader article, poured scorn on Nik’s assertion that he and Akinci had the same vision, and asked the prez: “Does he have the same bloodthirsty vision as Akinci, regarding the declaration of war on the Cyprus state if it exploits its natural wealth?”
I just hope the bloodthirsty Akinci does not threaten another war over Nik’s failure to honour the halloumi agreement.
THE HELLENIC Bank Running Under the Moon event, which is scheduled to be held on October 10 had not been well-received by everyone. Although it is difficult to believe that a running event that plans to raise money for charity could spark opposition, the fact is that it has angered a leading figure of our society.
The woman that has been behind the establishment of the Cyprus branch of Europa Donna – the European Breast Cancer Coalition that works to raise awareness for breast cancer and campaigns for improved care – DISY deputy Stella Kyriakidou was apparently furious when she heard about the rival event.
This was because it would be held on the same day (October 10) as the annual Europa Donna walk, which organisers hope would boost support for the establishment of a specialised breast centre in Kyproulla. A fun run followed by a party in Athalassa Park could attract people who would have otherwise have gone to the breast cancer walk.
Kyriakidou, who has become synonymous with Europa Donna after all the work she had done to establish it, felt that her worthy cause should not have to compete for attention on its big day with some superficial, fun event that would conclude with a party and angrily made her feelings known to one of Hellenic’s head honchos.
Her approach was of the ‘how dare you’ type and she forcefully demanded the date of the run was changed, preferably to another month, as October belonged to breast cancer.
TOUGH cookie Kyriakidou, who obviously has mean streak, despite her saintly, do-gooder public image, promised to crush the Hellenic event if the date was not changed, but the head honcho refused to budge, claiming the evening run would not affect the afternoon walk.
Having failed to secure the date change, steely Stella then demanded that Hellenic did not give the funds it would have raised to a cancer charity. The honcho refused to budge on this either, as the bank had already arranged for money raised to be given to PASYKAF, the Pancyprian Association of Cancer Patients and Friends.
This was not the end of the row however. A few days later, the bank received a letter from PASYKAF that the said the charity could not accept any money raised by Running Under the Moon and did not want its name associated with the event.
Has this ever happened before – a charity turning down an offer of money? It was a respectable bank that was offering the dosh, not the pancyprian association of cabaret owners and pimps from its immoral earnings. Anyone wanting to make a donation to PASYKAF next month better clear it with the saintly Stella first.
OUR CHURCH may have fallen on hard times, suffering the indignity of being forced by the banks to sell some of its prime real estate in order to pay off its non-performing loans, but our leading priests remain pretty sharp operators when it comes to money.
A local businessman managing foreign funds found out about this when he tried to buy a big sea-side plot in the Limassol district for a development project. He had the money available and was happy to pay the asking price, but the bishops kept stalling him, claiming that the plot was the subject of negotiations with the bank, which was in the process of evaluating it.
He thought the bank would be more than happy for the land to be sold directly by the Church as it would be spared the hassle and cost of evaluations, the public invitation for tenders and so forth. A priest informed him subsequently there was a very good reason the Church was insisting that the bank sold the real estate – it would not have to pay capital gains tax.
Apparently if a property is sold through the foreclosures procedure by a bank, no capital gains tax is paid by the owner. But if the Church sold it directly it would have to pay a few million in capital gains tax, something the priests, quite rightly, believe is not smart business practice.
COMRADE Tof was back in the news this week as he felt obliged to issue a statement about the passing of Costas Papacostas, who had served in his government as defence minister and was sentenced to five years in prison for his role in the Mari explosion.
Papacostas, a decent and honest man, was the fall-guy, taking the rap for Tof’s blunders and ending his life serving a prison sentence, albeit in a clinic. The shameless comrade said, “Papacostas paid a heavy price for the mistakes committed by others and despite his huge health problems he was sentenced to prison.”
He did not say who these others were. But if Papacostas had paid the price for the mistakes of others, why did the comrade not take the witness stand during his former minister’s trial and give testimony to avert the miscarriage of justice and the conviction of an innocent man? Is it because apart from a village idiot he is also big fat coward?
I READ this somewhere, but cannot credit the source because I cannot remember where. Before Nik left for the Big Apple, he invited comrade Tof to the presidential palace to brief him about the Cyprob. Don’t ask why, because I can’t even think of a stupid answer. For the first 55 minutes of the meeting Tof engaged in a monologue about what Nik should be doing. After briefing him for five minutes, Nik told Tof he had to leave because he had another engagement. The comrade was taken aback and complained that he was given only five minutes. Nik had allocated a whole hour, but it was not his fault Tof spent 55 minutes talking instead of listening. And of course, it was not Tof’s fault either.
I AM FEELING doubly embarrassed now, for suggesting two weeks ago that our good friend the Rector of the University of Cyprus had bowed to the unions and the parties on the issue of admitting students from private schools to the university.
Christofides did nothing of the sort and this week, responding to an invitation to attend a House education committee meeting on the issue on Tuesday, suggested the discussion would be better-served if representatives of the secondary school teachers union Oelmek were not present. How right he was. Oelmek’s leaders are bunch of self-serving bullies who never answer for the poor standards of state education but feel they have a God-given right to dictate the university’s admissions policy. These guys should be kept as far away from education policy as possible, not be invited to give their views.
UNION member and Limassol DISY deputy, Andreas Themistocelous – a political thug – proved the correctness of the rector’s position. The abusive comments on his Facebook page directed at the rector and parents said it all really. He labelled Christofides the “rector of illegality, lawlessness, amorality, nepotism…” but reserved most of his vitriol for the parents who backed the university’s decision.
“What you are praising is shameful! It is denying these seats from students who coughed blood to sit the Pancyprian exams,” Themistocleous wrote. “It is a blatant theft from children of heroes, missing persons, casualties or children that life or nature was unfair to. What you are praising, dear organised parents, is a sin, for which you should be ashamed of for the rest of your lives.”
MAINTAINING the religious tone, I had to laugh hearing the CyBC report that prez Nik told the American Jewish Committee that Cyprus and Israel had been “blessed with manna from the skies.” He was referring to the natural gas that is as far away from the skies as possible and is not very nourishing food for hungry people.
The post Tales from the Coffeeshop: The cheesy guardians of our state sovereignty appeared first on Cyprus Mail.